We Speak For Earth

Be the change you want to see here on Earth. Boldly protect your rights and the rights of all living things on Earth including the Earth itself.

Contributing Authors


‘Corporations Are Not People’


WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Jim McGovern of Massachusetts introduced today a constitutional amendment bill to overturn the US Supreme Court’s January 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. FEC and to make clear that corporations are not people with rights under the US Constitution. The introduction of the bill – the “People’s Rights Amendment” — marks a major breakthrough in the growing movement across the country to end corporate personhood and restore democracy to the people. 

“Corporations are not people,” said Congressman McGovern. “They do not breathe. They do not have children. They do not die in war. They are artificial entities which we the people create and, as such, we govern them, not the other way around.”

“The Citizens United ruling,” McGovern continued, “marks the most extreme extension of a corporate rights doctrine which has eroded our First Amendment and our Constitution. Now is the time for a 28th Amendment that lifts up the promise of American self-government: of, for, and by the people.”

The Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Citizens United v. FEC swept away a century of precedent barring corporate political expenditures and unleashed a torrent of corporate spending in US elections. The ruling applied the doctrine of corporate constitutional rights, a doctrine which corporations have used in recent years to strike down various federal and state laws designed to protect the public interest. 

“We are proud to stand with Congressman McGovern at this historic moment,” said John Bonifaz, the co-founder and director of Free Speech For People, a national non-partisan campaign launched on the day of the Citizens United ruling which authored the People’s Rights Amendment and has been mobilizing support throughout the nation for its enactment. “For the first time, the United States Congress now has the opportunity to debate a constitutional amendment bill that raises the fundamental question of whether people or corporations shall govern in America.”

“The nation is ready for this debate,” Bonifaz added, citing public opinion research that Free Speech For People commissioned showing widespread support across the political spectrum for a constitutional amendment like the one Congressman McGovern has introduced. “Americans understand that our democracy is at stake and that we must fight to preserve it. We see Congressman McGovern’s proposed amendment as another important strike on behalf of the 99 percent.”

Click here to view Congressman McGovern’s amendment.

Click here to download the press release.

  1. pocketfulofgeek reblogged this from evolveordie and added:
    Holy crap, common sense at last!
  2. jerrythedesigner reblogged this from evolveordie
  3. evolveordie reblogged this from northstarfan
  4. silverspiral reblogged this from thats-what-sidhe-said
  5. thats-what-sidhe-said reblogged this from miscella and added:
    Excellent! I hope this succeeds.
  6. miscella reblogged this from evillordzog
  7. shewhodancesunderthemoon reblogged this from evillordzog
  8. truthviamusic reblogged this from bryanb229
  9. jamessteiner reblogged this from wespeakfortheearth
  10. tviss reblogged this from wespeakfortheearth
  11. evillordzog reblogged this from northstarfan
  12. northstarfan reblogged this from knitmeapony
  13. iamgwenslongroadhome reblogged this from knitmeapony
  14. agodofwar reblogged this from wespeakfortheearth and added:
    this needs to be on the ballot so we can all have a say.
  15. onewomanrevolution reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  16. dreadforks reblogged this from that-katie-with-the-bangs
  17. justasecondoutofsync reblogged this from newly-poly-nyc and added:
    Actually yeah, I’m gonna have to second that. ^
  18. newly-poly-nyc reblogged this from justasecondoutofsync and added:
    No. This is a bad idea. Creating a law to undo this is a good idea. Adding an amendment to the Constitution is not. It’s...
  19. dandelionchild reblogged this from socialuprooting
  20. leekfixer reblogged this from socialuprooting and added:
  21. xnalydx reblogged this from iguessthisisme and added:
    See, this is something the “occupy” people should do everything in their ability to support, not crying about a...
  22. ltlerthqks reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  23. amodernmanifesto reblogged this from government-hookers
  24. caaahlo reblogged this from eastofthebay
  25. wespeakfortheearth posted this