The democratic process relies on the assumption that citizens (the majority of them, at least) can recognize the best political candidate, or best policy idea, when they see it. But a growing body of research has revealed an unfortunate aspect of the human psyche that would seem to disprove this notion, and imply instead that democratic elections produce mediocre leadership and policies.
The research, led by David Dunning, a psychologist at Cornell University, shows that incompetent people are inherently unable to judge the competence of other people, or the quality of those people’s ideas. For example, if people lack expertise on tax reform, it is very difficult for them to identify the candidates who are actual experts. They simply lack the mental tools needed to make meaningful judgments.
As a result, no amount of information or facts about political candidates can override the inherent inability of many voters to accurately evaluate them. On top of that, “very smart ideas are going to be hard for people to adopt, because most people don’t have the sophistication to recognize how good an idea is,” Dunning told Life’s Little Mysteries.
» via Live Science
All the more reason why we need better education, better media reporting, more accountability for mistakes/exaggerations/lies/etc.
“The democratic process relies on the assumption that citizens (the majority of them, at least) can recognize the best...
this just in, people dumb.
The democratic process relies on the assumption that citizens (the majority of them, at least) can recognize the best...
The party: welcome to it. …You’re late.
Part of me dies a little, another part of me wants to say I told you so…
More Information on this subject by John Green
So basically, the majority of people are stupid. Got it. And it’s a day that ends in ‘y’.
with the lack of education about how the government and its processes work in schools and the media i thought this was...